As crime writers, most of you are familiar with the concepts of motive, means, and opportunity as they pertain to developing suspects. Detectives often establish these facts through interviews and statements gathered during the course of an investigation. Statements like Brad hated Jessica for leaving him (motive) or Brad owns a gun (means) can carry a lot of weight. Detectives may also rely on certain documents like dining, bank, or gas receipts to place a person in a given location at a given time (opportunity).
But what about evidence at the actual crime scene? Detectives may not always have witnesses to talk to. Witnesses also lie. Sometimes the victim's identity is unknown. Some victims are very private and don't share a lot of information about their lives with friends and family (assuming they have either) so an evaluation of the evidence at the crime scene could be crucial in determining a number of things including;
- Is this a crime of premeditation or opportunity?
- Does the suspect know the victim?
- Could the suspect have physically committed the act?
As an author I always begin by asking myself "what is the motive?" There are a number of categories to choose from including jealousy, revenge, profit, or to conceal another crime. Once that is decided I then try to figure out the best way to demonstrate that to the reader. How do you "show" jealousy through physical evidence? A torn photograph perhaps? A stack of surveillance photographs? A box of love letters; each one more desperate and rambling than the last? If you want to add a twist then select evidence that could be interpreted in different ways. A love letter torn to sheds may not tell you who shredded it. Was it the jealous lover or the spouse?
Showing means is a bit more straightforward. Does the suspect have the ability or capacity to commit the crime? This will depend on the conditions at the crime scene. An adult male of reasonable physical strength could beat a victim with a baseball bat. But what about an elderly woman? Could a man you describe as a "linebacker" fit through a doggie door? Would a stranger have the security code for an alarm system? Would the reader believe that a suspect who doesn't own a car could elude the police in a car chase? These are all things to consider when laying a foundation for your characters.
Opportunity is usually a matter of keeping your time line straight. What kinds of physical evidence do police rely upon when considering opportunity? Receipts, surveillance video, text messages, toll charges, can all be good choices but they all depend upon one critical element; the correct time. How can you tell from a surveillance photo if the clock on the wall is showing the correct time or has dead batteries? Date/time stamps can be off by minutes, hours, days, even years. Police can account for this discrepancy by noting the time they collect the evidence or inspect the device but what if they forget? What if it was purposely altered? A surveillance video showing your suspect in the area of the crime might seem like great evidence until a forensic expert determines the shadows in the video are from the morning and not the afternoon when the crime was committed.
So as you are developing your story ask yourself "How do I show motive, means, and opportunity"? The evidence may be straightforward or it may have dual meanings. I find that people typically express themselves clearly. Sometimes it is a matter of eliminating all of the other possibilities. A photograph of a woman with a knife through it can only be interpreted so many ways right? These types of clues help keep the reader engaged and invested in the story. Whatever you choose to express yourself make sure that each of these issues is eventually addressed for the reader. If you don't...they'll surely let you know.
What you describe here, Tom, at least for me, is the hardest part of writing a novel. I call it the "nuts and bolts" phase, or to put it more simply, "making sense of stuff". Authors have to imagine stories that never before existed, and in doing so, find real challenges in making things match, be logical, and make sense. It's easy to recount an actual crime, or read about one, but to create one out of thin air, not so much. I'm enjoying your posts because they tend to add some logic to what sometimes feels like an illogical process.ReplyDelete
Tom, I love the clarity your posts bring to my often muddled perception of details.ReplyDelete
As crime writers, we're writing fictional stories that require factual elements. I could probably convince one or two people I know what I'm talking about when I don't. However, on the off chance I might have more than a couple of readers, you are helping to save my career before it begins.
I agree with Andrew: This is the most challenging aspect of writing crime stories. I map as much of the evidence as I can during outlining, but I always have to add/modify/rethink all of it as I write. Thanks for a great post.ReplyDelete
I just discovered your blog and love it. Your information, along with my copy of Forensics for Dummies, will help me add authenticity and credibility to my mysteries. Thanks again for your assistance to mystery authors.ReplyDelete
Your articles are always fascinating, Tom! And invaluable to crime writers, with all their "insider" information! You're going to develop quite a following here at CFC, I'm sure!ReplyDelete
Thank you, I really do appreciate your kind words. Believe me, I learn way more from you professional writers than I think you get from me. I don't think I would ever been ready to release my novel without the valuable lessons I've learned.ReplyDelete